New Mag and BM pictures

[sundownz]

Oh yah... made a post on CA.com as I just saw the big thread:

http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showpo...&postcount=165

[Electrodynamic]

Originally Posted by sundownz

Oh yah... made a post on CA.com as I just saw the big thread:

http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showpo...&postcount=165

LOL! I saw your post over there. I've been gone for a little over a week and almost forgot how much I missed seeing your posts, haha.

[HHawk]

Originally Posted by Electrodynamic @ caraudio.com
Oh yeah, I almost forgot about why I started to post - I think HHawk might be the first person to order a Mag after I open up ordering. There are a lot of people waiting to order, and he's hot on the trail to order a trio of Mag 12's to put in his Lexus. I want a few too, but he might get them before I do!!

You keep remembering me... That's a good thing.
Man I still remember, a few years back, when I was looking for subwoofers, I contacted you. I was trying to decide if I should buy 2 (old models) Mag or the RE XXX (Mk I). Due to circumstances, I choose 2 RE XXX's back then. Was a good choice, to bad I really never get to listen to the Mag though.

Not many people overhere (the Netherlands) buy (unknown brand) subwoofers. Most people over here are Rockford or GroundZero biased. Oh well, their loss.

[Transformers]

Since you're not releasing T/S yet ( ), what type of response would the BM's (or heck, even the Mag's) be looking at IB ??

[Tirefryr]

Pretty much the same response curve you'd see in a sealed enclosure, albeit quite a bit flatter.

[hoss]

srsly nick, full frontal and rear pics of the new BM or im coming and raping you and making your girlfriend watch...

[Transformers]

Originally Posted by Tirefryr

Pretty much the same response curve you'd see in a sealed enclosure, albeit quite a bit flatter.

Sorry, should have been more specific (though considering we don't know the response of the driver in a sealed enclosure, your answer still doesn't get us anywhere ).

I was thinking more in terms of Q & F3. Are we going to be in low Q/low F3, high Q/High F3, high Q/low F3, etc ??

[Tirefryr]

Both will be dependent upon the vehicle's transfer function, the actual airspace in front of and behind the cone, and any leaks. There's no real way to tell until it's in the vehicle and measured. WE could estimate, but as you've stated, we still don't have an anechoic response from a production unit yet, hence my previous response.

[hobie1dog]

WE could estimate




Estimation is Masturbation....hey, that's my actual job title....Estimator that is.

[Electrodynamic]

Ryan's right, in your vehicle with the driver(s) in an IB alignment, it's impossible for us to calculate F3, F10, etc without actually owning one and testing it ourselves. Like Ryan said, IB will give you the deepest flattest response possible. It also takes your power handling and chunks it out the window. With the response that the new Mag and BM's are going to have in small sealed boxes it's kind of fruitless to want an IB install.

As it stands now, the new Mag's F3 is 10 Hz lower than the current Mag's F3 when they're both in 1 cubic foot sealed. 10 Hz lower is a BIG difference!