Stereo Integrity Forums  

Go Back   Stereo Integrity Forums > Stereo integrity > SI General area
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

SI General area General realted discussions, comments or reviews of Stereo Integrity.

BM mkIII FAQ

This is a discussion on BM mkIII FAQ within the SI General area forums, part of the Stereo integrity category; Our web guy is out of commission for a few weeks, so until he gets better here is the BM ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2010, 12:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Stereo Integrity Owner
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,148
Default BM mkIII FAQ

Our web guy is out of commission for a few weeks, so until he gets better here is the BM FAQ:

What is the mounting depth if mounted on a normal ¾” piece of material?

When mounted to a ¾” piece of MDF or other material the mounting depth of the BM mkIII is 2.75”.


What size enclosure can I put the BM mkIII in?


For optimum performance the enclosure volume can anywhere between 0.42 ft^3 and 0.55 ft^3 sealed. We highly recommend stuffing any sealed subwoofer enclosure with polyfill and/or fiberglass insulation.


Can I put the BM mkIII in a smaller enclosure or a larger enclosure?


Yes you can. However, power handling and/or low frequency extension will be affected. The BM mkIII has been engineered to provide optimum performance in 0.5 ft^3 sealed. Making the enclosure volume significantly smaller than recommended will cause a reduction in low frequency extension. On the other side, making the enclosure volume larger will significantly reduce the power handling of the driver.
If you make the enclosure smaller than recommended (0.5 ft^3 sealed), we highly suggest using an aperiodic membrane such as a ScanSpeak Variovent.
Making the enclosure larger will diminish power handling as follows: In 0.75 ft^3 power handling is reduced to 400 watts RMS. In 1 ft^3 the power handling is reduced to 300 watts RMS.


How much room does the BM mkIII take up inside the enclosure?

The BM mkIII 12” subwoofer displaces 0.05 ft^3.


How much room do I need behind the subwoofer?

If you have no other choice, you can put the back of the BM mkIII 1/8” away from the back of your enclosure. Ideally there should be ¼” to ½” of space behind the BM mkIII.


Does the BM mkIII need 450 watts RMS to perform?

Absolutely not. The new BM mkIII is a very efficient subwoofer thanks in part to its XBL^2 enabled motor and it does not need every bit of its power handling limit in order to perform well. In its recommended enclosure volume of 0.5^3 sealed, the BM mkIII’s ideal power range is 200 to 450 watts RMS.
__________________
Electrodynamic
Don't install suckage!
Power handling is not a power requirement!
Simon Eichenberger is the man.

Last edited by Electrodynamic; 10-07-2010 at 07:12 PM.
Electrodynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2010, 11:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Port Townsend WA
Posts: 6
Default

Great post. Looks like I'm going to go easy on my gain, since my amp is rated @ 500rms.

edit: why the need for stuffing?
ma_ttcald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2010, 02:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Stereo Integrity Owner
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma_ttcald View Post
Great post. Looks like I'm going to go easy on my gain, since my amp is rated @ 500rms.

edit: why the need for stuffing?
Stuffing an enclosure (we recommend lining the walls with fiberglass insulation over using polyfill) reduces internal resonances which smooths out the overall response. It also fools your subwoofer into thinking it's in a larger enclosure. For instance, if you had an enclosure that was 1 ft^3 and you stuffed it with a pound of polyfill the subwoofer would think it's in 1.25 ft^3. I.e. it will play lower.
__________________
Electrodynamic
Don't install suckage!
Power handling is not a power requirement!
Simon Eichenberger is the man.
Electrodynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Port Townsend WA
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrodynamic View Post
Stuffing an enclosure (we recommend lining the walls with fiberglass insulation over using polyfill) reduces internal resonances which smooths out the overall response. It also fools your subwoofer into thinking it's in a larger enclosure. For instance, if you had an enclosure that was 1 ft^3 and you stuffed it with a pound of polyfill the subwoofer would think it's in 1.25 ft^3. I.e. it will play lower.
Even if my box is at .5 cu ft, stuffing is still a good idea? If so how much?
ma_ttcald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 01:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Stereo Integrity Owner
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ma_ttcald View Post
Even if my box is at .5 cu ft, stuffing is still a good idea? If so how much?
Stuff is always a good idea for any size sealed enclosure. Simply apply the general rule I posted in my previous post. In your case, stuff the enclosure with a half of a pound of polyfill since your enclosure volume is 0.5 ft^3.

But we still prefer fiberglass insulation lining most of the interior walls to polyfill because of the acoustic benefits over simply using poly.

...actually I didn't say it was a general rule in that post did I? Anyway, the general rule for stuffing sealed enclosures is: 1 lb of polyfill per 1 ft^3 of volume. If you have 1.4 cubes, use 1.4 lbs. If you have 0.37 cubes, use 0.37 pounds.
__________________
Electrodynamic
Don't install suckage!
Power handling is not a power requirement!
Simon Eichenberger is the man.

Last edited by Electrodynamic; 01-11-2010 at 01:35 PM.
Electrodynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 07:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
dantonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 11
Default

What Fiberglass Lining do you recommend?
dantonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 07:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Stereo Integrity Owner
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,148
Default

Something like this. The smallest, tiniest roll you can find. Don't smother the subwoofer, but line the walls with it.
__________________
Electrodynamic
Don't install suckage!
Power handling is not a power requirement!
Simon Eichenberger is the man.
Electrodynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 06:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11
Default

I was just going to put in my order for 2 BM MkIII but was not sure what Ohm load they carry? Are they 4ohm or 2ohm?

Also, what is the release date for the preorders? If I order now will I still get them within the 60 days?

Thanks!!!
Mid Life Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 06:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
Stereo Integrity Owner
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,148
Default

The VC configuration is stated on the right hand side of the BM mkIII's web page, "2.5" diameter, dual 4ohm, voice coil".

We're still putting some test drivers through power testing right now but I'll have an update on the ETA for actual shipment in the next week or so.
__________________
Electrodynamic
Don't install suckage!
Power handling is not a power requirement!
Simon Eichenberger is the man.
Electrodynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 05:16 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrodynamic View Post
The VC configuration is stated on the right hand side of the BM mkIII's web page, "2.5" diameter, dual 4ohm, voice coil".

We're still putting some test drivers through power testing right now but I'll have an update on the ETA for actual shipment in the next week or so.
Gotcha..... I completely missed that part! One more question.... I know I read that it was designed for .5cubes and a larger enclosure will reduce the power handling, but what will it do to the longevity of the driver? If say its in .66cubes will it change the sound charictaristic to be more of a boom rather than tight thump?

Sorry for the questions. Just trying to get all the info I can so when I purchase them I am 100%.

Thanks again!
Mid Life Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© Copyright 2003 Stereo Integrity. All rights reserved.